Team:BITSPilani-Goa India/Model/Inoculant

Inoculant | SugarGain | iGEM BITS Goa

The Safari browser doesn't support some features of this website. Please switch to Firefox, Edge or Chrome for a better experience.

Inoculant

Motivation

In this model, we aim to determine the optimum kinematic viscosity (also known as "momentum diffusivity", is equal to the ratio of the viscosity to the density of the fluid) of the polymer-based liquid inoculant suspension of the bacteria that is introduced into the plant system. Furthermore, we also show through this model that our inoculant is capable of being transported throughout the plant system by the vascular tissue.

Mathematical Model

(Note: Henceforth, we shall be using the term ‘viscosity’ to refer to the kinematic viscosity of the liquid, unless stated otherwise.)

To allow for the inoculant to be viscous enough for viable vascular transport, we make the assumption that its viscosity lies between certain permissible values. The viscosity is assumed to lie within a certain interval centered around the kinematic viscosity of water. Let \( \sigma \) represent this range and \( \nu_w \) represent the viscosity of water, then the viscosity of the inoculant, \( \nu \), lies within the range

$$ \nu_w - \sigma \leq \nu \leq \nu_w + \sigma $$

Suppose our polymer-based inoculant consists of \( N \) components, we can determine the Viscosity Blending Number of each component Refutas, 2000. The VBN ~ Viscosity Blending Number of a particular solvent with viscosity \( \nu_i \) is

$$ \text{VBN}_i = 14.534\cdot\ln(\ln(\nu_i + 0.8)) + 10.975 $$

The VBN of the N-component solvent is then calculated as

$$ \text{VBN} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \chi_i \cdot \text{VBN}_i $$

Where \( \chi_i \) is the mass fraction of each component. Given the VBN of the mixture, the viscosity can be calculated as: $$ \nu = \exp\left(\exp\left(\frac{\text{VBN} - 10.975}{14.534}\right)\right) - 0.8 $$

Imposing the assumption we made about the viscosity of the inoculant, we obtain the following constraint on the viscosity:

$$ 14.534\ln(\ln(\nu_w + 0.8 -\sigma)) + 10.975 \leq \sum_{i = 1}^{N} \chi_i \cdot \text{VBN}_i \leq 14.534\ln(\ln(\nu_w + 0.8 +\sigma)) \ + 10.975 $$

If we use the total toxicity of the inoculant as a cost function (this is a reasonable choice as the inoculant is going to be introduced into a food product), we can then set up a linear optimisation problem to determine the viscosity of the inoculant. Using the LD50 ~ Median Lethal Dose (Rat, oral) values for each component (represented by \(T_i\)), we can set up the cost function $$ C = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \chi_i \cdot T_i $$

The term \( \sigma \) is set to 15% of the viscosity of water. This means that we have allowed the numerical value of the viscosity of the inocluant to lie within 15% of that of water.

The components of the inoculant were outlined in Goudar et al. 2017. They are: Luria-Bertani Broth, Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), Bentonite, Triton X 100, Sorbic Acid, and Potassium Sorbate. These components were selected for their low toxicity and relative ease of availability. Another reason for choosing these set of components was that they can easily be removed from the juice by methods that are already used in the sugar manufacturing process. For a detailed description of the removal process and the sugar manufactuing process, look at our Experiments page.

We formulated a linear optimisation problem using the cost function and the constraints derived above. Using SciPy's minimize method we solved the problem to find the optimal composition of the inoculant. The resultling optimal concentrations of each component, along with their LD50 values are tabulated below.

Table 2: Optimal concentration of each component in the inoculant
ComponentLD50 (Rats, oral) (g/kg)Optimised Concentration (w/w)
Culture Broth (LB)95
Triton X 1004.193.1
Carboxymethyl cellulose270.1
Bentonite1.4
Sorbic Acid7.360.2
Potassium Sorbate4.340.2

Using the VBN approach stated above, we obtain that the viscosity of the inoculant is \(1.266 \text{ cSt }\) (= \( 1.266 \times 10^{-6} m^2s^{-1}\)). This viscosity now serves as an ansatz and can be plugged into the equation for water transport in xylem tissues and a velocity of transport for the solvent can be obtained.

The Reynolds number for transport in xylem tissue is 0.05 Rand, 1983 and the xylem diameter is 50 μm Evans & Morris, 2017. The expression for the Reynolds number for a xylem of diameter \( D \) and a fluid with flow rate \( V \) and viscosity \( \nu \) is $$ R = \frac{VD}{\nu} $$

Plugging in the values, we obtain that the velocity of flow of the inoculant through the vascular tissue is \(1.2 \times 10^{-3} m s^{-1} \). This value is consistent with values found in literature Evans & Morris, 2017. This proves that our ansatz was correct.

Insights

Therefore, through this model,

  1. We have found the optimal viscosity and composition of our inoculant, which is \(1.266 \text{ cSt }\); and using the calcualted viscosity as an ansatz, we have proven that the inoculant is capable of being transported through the vascular tissue in the plant. This helped us design the injector delivery mechanism for targeted application before harvest.

  2. We have minimised the toxicity of our inoculant and to this end, we have also designed experiments that mimic the sugar manufacturing process which would help us prove that remnants of the inoculant in the sugarcane are removed during the actual manufacturing process. This would also verify the biosafety considerations we have made.

References

  1. Maples, R. E. (2000).

    Petroleum Refinery Process Economics.

    PennWell Books.

    Google BooksBack to text
  2. Rand, R. H. (1983).

    Fluid Mechanics of Green Plants.

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 15(1), 29-45.

    CrossRefGoogle ScholarBack to text
  3. Evans, M. J., & Morris, R. J. (2017).

    Chemical agents transported by xylem mass flow propagate variation potentials.

    The Plant Journal 91(6), 1029-1037.

    CrossRefGoogle ScholarBack to text
  4. Goudar, G., Sreenivasulu, G., Kumbar, B., & Nagaraj, H. (2017).

    Plant Growth Promotional Activity of Newly Developed Formulation of Azospirillum on Maize.

    International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(12), 370-380.

    CrossRefGoogle ScholarBack to text