Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Education"

Line 73: Line 73:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
         <div class="headline">
+
 
 +
<div class="headline" id="Chapter3">
 +
    <h1>
 +
    Our Podcast Genomenal (Überschrift noch ändern??)
 +
    </h1>
 +
</div>
 +
   
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
         <input id="testID" type="checkbox">
 +
            <label for="testID" class="dropdownhead">
 +
           
 +
                <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
                <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 1: Introducing our podcast</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
            </label>
 +
       
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
            <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
            <p>The first episode of our podcast “Genomenal” set the base for our science series on biotechnology. We created this podcast in terms of science communication with the goal to help anyone outside the biotechnology community understand all the perks and versatilities of this field. The first episode serves as an introduction to the origin of this project and its background. Our first two speakers offer a first glimpse of the topic of biotechnology – trying to explain basic terms such as “genes”, “genome” and “enzyme” understandably. Following topics like the colors of biotechnology or an eventual episode on iGEM are mentioned to encourage the audience to keep listening to the series. In hopes of achieving that goal, the first episode leaves an open end, with topics left for further discussion.  </p>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
        <input id="testID" type="checkbox">
 +
            <label for="testID" class="dropdownhead">
 +
           
 +
                <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
                <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 2: Genetic Engineering and genetcally engineered Organisms - What the law is saying</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
            </label>
 +
       
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
            <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
        <p> 
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
        <input id="testID" type="checkbox">
 +
            <label for="testID" class="dropdownhead">
 +
           
 +
                <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
                <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 3: Enzymes in laundry powder and genetically modified potatoes - What are white and green biotechnology?</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
            </label>
 +
       
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
            <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
        <p>  In the third episode of our podcast we are talking about white and green biotechnology. After a general explanation about the  various notations with colors for the different areas of biotechnology, we are addressing white biotechnology in detail. This field deals with the industrial production of chemicals and components with optimized enzymes, cells and microorganisms (1). The aim of white biotechnology is to generate new and sustainable production processes (2). As an example, we explain how enzymes for washing agents are being produced using microorganisms by  supplying them with genetic information via plasmid transfer (3). Afterwards, we move on to green biotechnology which is roughly about plants and how to optimize them (4). Already in the 20th century people started to breed plants with the favored characteristics, like big size or sweet fruits. Nowadays there are way more possibilities to optimize plants and modify their genomes(5).  As an example, we introduce the amflora potato in which the production of amylose is genetically knocked out and only amylopectin starch is produced (6). This engineered potato species was developed by BASF and grown in Germany between 2010 and 2012 (6). Furthermore, we are talking about the MON810-corn produced by Monsanto 1998 (7). The genome of this corn is modified so that the plant is producing a Bt-toxin which is toxic to certain insects (7). In the end, we are answering some more questions about green biotechnology, for example, if genetically modified plants  could interbreed with other plants or if they could have an impact on bees. </p>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
        <input id="testID" type="checkbox">
 +
            <label for="testID" class="dropdownhead">
 +
           
 +
                <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
                <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 4: Artificial hearts and less animal experiments - what does red biotechnology mean for the future?</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
            </label>
 +
       
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
            <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
        <p>  Artificial hearts and less animal experiments - what does red biotechnology mean for the future? This is the title of the fourth episode of our podcast “Genomenal”. This episode is a continuation of the third episode, which was about green and white biotechnology. </p>
 +
 
 +
Red biotechnology deals with medical issues and specifically focusses on the detection and treatment of abounding diseases. We aimed to give the audience a better understanding of this topic by mentioning diabetes as an exemplary disease. To demonstrate the benefits of red biotechnology, we talk about how insulin can be produced by microorganisms rather than using a porcine or bovine pancreas. This way, we want to convey the perks biotechnology brings not only to humans but also to animals. Following this topic, we talk about how it has already been achieved to engineer a beating rat heart and that this field is called tissue engineering. Thereby, we can show how much potential lies in this area and that it would eventually spare the need of organ transplants. </p>
 +
 
 +
We also talk about Dolly, the first successfully cloned animal, to mention that progress has already been made in this field. In this regard, we also try to acknowledge the ethical dilemma that inevitably accompanies this topic – using it to promote our upcoming episode on ethics. Once more, we leave the end rather open for discussion to encourage our audience to keep listening to our podcast.  </p>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div class="headline">
 
             <h1>
 
             <h1>
 
             Minigame
 
             Minigame

Revision as of 16:26, 3 October 2020



Biotechnology - What is it and what does it mean?

These questions are probably asked by many, especially younger people. But even older age groups might find themselves in unprecedented circumstances when they are presented with terms such as enzyme, gene or plasmid. Keeping this in mind, we have made it our task to evoke some long overdue change in this respect. For this, we developed several projects that all contribute to a better understanding of synthetic biology (SynBio). Admittedly, science communication is not only a topic in SynBio, but of all other sciences as well, but we decided to lay our focus on what we know best.

We tried to reach the widest possible audience with our projects. In order to achieve this, first of all we had to gain an overview of the already existing knowledge in the minds of the broad masses which we managed to accomplish by an online survey with 292 participants. (click here) We have also taken up this issue in a livestream on social media which we carried out together with the iGEM Team Kaiserslautern, in order to publicly provide further information about topics of synthetic biology for those interested. (click here)

We also created a podcast called "Genomenal" which is aimed at people of all ages who would like to learn more about biotechnology and iGEM. “Genomenal” can be found on Spotify, our university website and on our wiki (click here). We have also thought of something for the younger part of society. Together with Aleksa Zecevic (click here), we have developed a mini-game called “The Genomenal Adventures of Dr. W”, which introduces biological practices in a playful and amusing way. (click here)

Last but not least, we also wanted to explicitly address students in the upper grades who might be thinking about a future career pathway in biology. For this, we have worked together with the Kurt-Schumacher-Schule in Karben. For this school, we hosted a zoom call in which we introduced the topic of iGEM to an advanced course for biology. We reported about our experiences and gave tips regarding our studies of biology and chemistry with the hope to enthuse them for scientifical studies. (click here)

figure
Figure 1: Our various Science Communication Efforts.

Our Survey – the basis for our Science Communication

What comes to your mind when you hear “Synthetic Biology” or “GMO”? You probably think of all the promising iGEM projects you know or all the great possibilities this field offers for the future. But this is not the fact for everyone yet. Many people are not feeling comfortable when they hear these terms. When you go to a grocery store in Germany, there is a sign which says “without genetic engineering” on a lot of products. We wanted to find out the reasons for these reservations, because we think that many of these concerns are based on lacking knowledge. Therefore, we created a survey and reached almost 300 people. What does the public know about synthetic biology? Do they have a clue what is behind this term? What advantages and, more importantly, what risks do they think of when they hear this term?

Besides that, we were curious how the public estimates the problem of micropollutants in our waters and what they think of our solution. By doing this survey we also tried to reach awareness for these topics into people’s daily lives.

Results:

While about 80 percent can imagine what a genetically modified organism is, only 53 percent have an idea what synthetic biology could be. When asked if they have ever been in contact with a GMO before, almost one quarter answered that they don’t know. We specified the question by asking if they had ever consumed something that was produced by using GMOs. The number of participants who were not sure about that was not much lower. As these numbers are quite high and regarding that the 292 people we reached are no perfectly representative sample, there is a task we can get from our survey. One part of our project involved doing science communication. We aimed to reach more people not related to our university or scientific work. Since the COVID-19 pandemic made it really difficult to address people on the street, for example, we decided to focus on other projects like our podcast "Genomenal" and a minigame.

At least 90 percent of all participants told us that they definitely see a threat in the wastewater pollution by pharmaceutical residues. By asking if they think it’s alright to bring a GMO into a wastewater treatment plant, we found that about 70 percent have concerns regarding this idea or at least would not agree completely. Following this question, we asked these participants the same question but under the condition that our GMO will leave the waste water treatment plant under no circumstances. By this addition we were able to lower the disagreement. Only 45 percent of the interviewees still had concerns.

In the end of our survey we asked them about advantages they see in synthetic biology. About 80 percent of the participants told us that they see future applications especially in environmental protection and medicine. Since there was also the option ‘in none of these areas’ this result leaves us in a positive mood!

Our Podcast Genomenal (Überschrift noch ändern??)