Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Project/Biofilm"

Line 2,134: Line 2,134:
 
sporulation in the biofilm population.
 
sporulation in the biofilm population.
 
<br>
 
<br>
The sigma&nbsp;factor&nbsp;F&nbsp;(σF) plays a critical role in the
+
The sigma&nbsp;factor&nbsp;F&nbsp;(σ<sup>F</sup>) plays a critical role in the
 
sporulation of <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i> by controlling several required genes <sup id="cite_ref-N"><a href="#cite_note-N">[9]</a></sup>  (Abbildung).
 
sporulation of <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i> by controlling several required genes <sup id="cite_ref-N"><a href="#cite_note-N">[9]</a></sup>  (Abbildung).
The absence of σF renders <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i> unable to sporulate <sup id="cite_ref-N"><a href="#cite_note-N">[10]</a></sup> , which is why we want
+
The absence of σ<sup>F</sup> renders <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i> unable to sporulate <sup id="cite_ref-N"><a href="#cite_note-N">[10]</a></sup> , which is why we want
to knockout the σF gene in the genome of our <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i>.
+
to knockout the <i>sigF</i> gene in the genome of our <i>B.&nbsp;subtilis</i>.
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 14:27, 14 October 2020

image/svg+xml - O O



Requirements of the biofilm

Biofilm engineering

Displaying our degradation enzymes in the biofilm matrix


The Major Biofilm Matrix Component (TasA)

The Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix consists mainly of exopolysaccharides (EPS) and proteins (Verlinkung Biofilm Formation text). One protein essential for the structure and formation of a biofilm is the major biofilm matrix component (TasA).[1] It polymerizes into long amyloid-like fibres which are attached to the cell wall by the TasA anchoring protein (TapA) outside of the cell.[2] The knockout of tasA leads to a mutant that forms a weak biofilm of decreased thickness.[3] B. subtilis secretes proteins in order to enable intercellular linkages and communication and therefore uses the Sec-dependent signal recognition particle (Sec-SRP) pathway. For proteins to be secreted via the SPR pathway, it is necessary that the proteins possess a 27 amino acids long N-terminal signal peptide, which is cleaved off during the membrane translocation. Following this scheme, TasA also possesses this N-terminal signaling peptide.[4,5] The Sec-SRP pathway consists of four main steps: 1) the signal peptide is recognized by a ribonucleoprotein complex, the signal recognition particle (SRP). 2) SRP targets the Sec translocase which transports the protein through the membrane. 3) during membrane translocation the signal peptide is cleaved off by the SipW peptidase leading to the release of the protein. 4) chaperones mediate the correct folding of the protein outside the cell.[5]

A Fusion Protein of TasA with our degradation Enzymes

We want to immobilize our degradation enzymes in the biofilm matrix, due to the improved stability and improved enzyme activity of immobilized enzymes.(6) Furthermore, within the biofilm matrix the degradation targets are better accessible for enzymatic degradation than within the cytoplasm. (Verlinkung Text Pharmis Immobilization). Therefore, we decided to generate fusion proteins with our degradation enzymes and the protein TasA, following previous work by Huang et al. (7). They showed that fusion proteins consisting of TasA and a second protein domain (e.g. mCherry, SpyTag) are successfully exported into the biofilm matrix. Even a fusion protein of TasA with the larger enzyme MHETase (63.1 kDa) was localized in the biofilm matrix of B. subtilis. Based on the research of Huang et al., we planned the fusion protein of superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) with TasA as a proof of concept. The sequence of the sfGFP gene is codon optimized for B. subtilis and fused to the C-terminus of the tasA gene with a gene fragment encoding a glycine-serin-rich linker (ARGGGGSGGGGS). The display of the TasA-sfGFP fusion protein in the biofilm matrix can be verified using fluorescence microscopy (Verlinkung Engineering Success). If TasA-sfGFP is successfully expressed in the biofilm matrix, we hypothesize that analogously designed TasA fusion proteins with our targeted degradation enzymes CotA, CueO and EreB will likely succeed. (Verlinkung Text Pharmis)

Integration of the TasA fusion proteins in the B. subtilis genome

We want to ensure that only TasA fusion proteins, but no endogenous TasA, are secreted into the matrix in order to increase the number of immobilized degradation enzymes in the biofilm matrix. Therefore, we use a B. subtilis TasA knockout strain supplied by the group of Prof. Stülke (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (8). Then as a proof of concept, the TasA fusion protein will be introduced in B. subtilis via plasmids (see Huang et al.). In the next step we want to integrate the TasA fusion proteins into the genome of our B. subtilis strain. For further information on the workflow and analysis of our concept, please refer to our next on Engineering Success. [Verlinkung Engineering Success]

Improvement of Biofilm Formation

Obviation of Sporulation

Bacillus subtilis is able to form endospores (Verlinkung Text über B. subtilis). During B. subtilis biofilm maturation, cells can sporulate and leave the biofilm [8] which could cause an escape of our genetically modified organisms into the environment. Since endospores are physiologically inactive, they do not express enzymes and thus do not contribute to micropollutant degradation. For these reasons, we aim to prevent any sporulation in the biofilm population.
The sigma factor F (σF) plays a critical role in the sporulation of B. subtilis by controlling several required genes [9] (Abbildung). The absence of σF renders B. subtilis unable to sporulate [10] , which is why we want to knockout the sigF gene in the genome of our B. subtilis.

final Bacillus Subtilis

Testing

Flowchamber

Atomic Force Microscopy

Assay small molecule sorption into the biofilm

We want to produce our pollutant-degrading enzymes fused to one of the B. subtilis biofilm-forming proteins, the major protein component (TasA). This way it will be displayed in the matrix of the biofilm. We need to make sure that the substances are able to enter the biofilm to be converted by our displayed enzymes. Here we focused on the sorption of diclofenac because it poses the biggest issue in wastewater treatment plants. Torresi et al. recently established an assay to measure the uptake of small molecules into biofilms of various thickness on which our assay is based on[1].

We grow the biofilm directly on carriers used in wastewater treatment to make the experiment as realistic as possible. After the biofilm is formed on the carriers, we test the diclofenac uptake. Therefore, we incubate the carriers with different concentrations of diclofenac and take samples of both the solution and the biofilm at certain time points. The biofilm sample is resuspended in water, centrifuged and washed repeatedly. After that, the cells are lysed via sonification and the suspension is centrifuged again to clear the lysate. The supernatants of this step and the samples of the diclofenac solutions are quantified via UV after HPLC separation. If diclofenac is absorbed by the biofilm at the assayed concentrations, we will do the same with concentrations that can be found in wastewater in Germany and then analyze the taken samples via LC-MS because it is more sensitive than HPLC with UV detection[2].
figure
Figure 1: Ich bin der ROM
Importantly, plastics has shown adsorption of hydrophobic substances[3]. On that account, we perform the same assay with an empty carrier in diclofenac solution to see potential adsorption to the carrier itself.

References

1.Torresi, E.; Polesel, F.; Bester, K. Diffusion and Sorption of Organic Micropollutants in Biofilms with Varying Thicknesses. Water Res. 2017, 123, 388–400 Doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.027 2.Abdel-Hamid, M. E. Comparative LC-MS and HPLC Analyses of Selected Antiepileptics and Beta-Blocking Drugs. Farmaco 2000, 55 (2), 136–145 Doi:10.1016/S0014-827X(00)00006-9 3.Zhang, H.; Pap, S.; Taggart, M. A. A Review of the Potential Utilisation of Plastic Waste as Adsorbent for Removal of Hazardous Priority Contaminants from Aqueous Environments. Environmental Pollution. Elsevier Ltd March 1, 2020, p 113698 Doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113698 4.Andersson, S., Nilsson, M., Dalhammar, G. (2008). Assessment of carrier materials for biofilm formation and denitrification. Vatten, 64, 201–207. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-10154 5. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2020). PubChem Compound Summary for CID 3033, Diclofenac. Retrieved October 4, 2020 from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Diclofenac 6.Marvasi, M.; Visscher, P. T.; Casillas Martinez, L. Exopolymeric Substances (EPS) from Bacillus Subtilis : Polymers and Genes Encoding Their Synthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 313 (1), 1–9 Doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02085.x 7.Shukla, A.; Mehta, K.; Parmar, J. Depicting the Exemplary Knowledge of Microbial Exopolysaccharides in a Nutshell. European Polymer Journal. Elsevier Ltd October 1, 2019, pp 298–310 Doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.07.044 8. Kolter et al. (2013) Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nat Rev Microbiol. 11(3): 157-168 9. Errington, J. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol 1, 117–126 (2003). 10. Overkamp W, Kuipers OP. Transcriptional Profile of Bacillus subtilis sigF-Mutant during Vegetative Growth. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141553. Published 2015 Oct 27. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141553