Difference between revisions of "Team:TU Darmstadt/Education"

Line 3,567: Line 3,567:
 
            
 
            
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
    <input id="testID6" type="checkbox">
 +
    <label for="testID6" class="dropdownhead">
 +
 +
        <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
        <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 7:Our project</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
    </label>
 +
 +
    <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
            <div> ...
 +
</div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
    <input id="testID7" type="checkbox">
 +
    <label for="testID7" class="dropdownhead">
 +
 +
        <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
        <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 8: Responsible Research – When is a project ethically justifiable?</div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
    </label>
 +
 +
    <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
            <div> In this episode of our podcast we focus on the topics <b>ethic and responsibility</b> related to science and research projects. Therefore, we talked with several experts and integrated some of their statements into this episode. After the usual introduction we start with a clip of <b>Professor Alfred Nordmann</b>, a philosopher of our university. He explains how the term “ethics” can be understood and what ethics means for research. First of all, ethics is a broad term that includes many aspects and values. There is no longer a checklist that researchers can use to decide whether their project is ethically responsible or not. Nowadays this is way more complex and the important part is to get in touch with all different stakeholders and groups that could be affected by a project. This includes talking to people and facing possible questions. A newer term for this process is <b>“Responsible Research and Innovation”</b> or short RRI. In the following we talked about how we have implemented RRI in our project by going through different aspects, mention some of the experts we interviewed and explain how we tried to improve our project as much as possible (Verlinkung Integrated Human Practices). We played another clip, this time from <b>Professor Andreas Jürgens</b> of the Department of Biology, also from our university. He gave us some input about risk evaluation and worst-case scenarios, which is why we discussed what could happen if our genetically modified organism would leave the waste water treatment plant and what we are doing to avoid this and to minimize the risk (Verlinkung savety). In the end we also talked about why it is important to <b>include the society</b> and how we try to reach many people with <b>science communication</b>. Of course, there are still open questions, like who should pay for additional costs for the wastewater treatment that would occur due to the implementation of our project. We hope that with this episode we could give the listeners an idea of responsible research and inspire them to think about it themselves.  <br> <br>
 +
<b>See our subpage Responsible Research</b> (Verlinkung) to learn more about our process in this area.
 +
</div>
 +
    </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<div class="dropdowncontainer">
 +
    <input id="testID8" type="checkbox">
 +
    <label for="testID8" class="dropdownhead">
 +
 +
        <div style="padding: 0 10px"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/f/f8/T--TU_Darmstadt--Pfeil-rechts.png" alt="pfeilzumausfahren" style="width:15px;height:auto;padding:10px;"> </div>
 +
        <div class="dropdownheadtext"> Episode 9: CRISPR </div> <!-- hier wird der Name des Buttons geändert-->
 +
    </label>
 +
 +
    <div class="dropdowncontent">
 +
        <div class="dropdowncontenttext"> <!-- in dieses div kommt der eigentliche content-->
 +
            <div> ...
 +
</div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 16:17, 18 October 2020

image/svg+xml - O O



Biotechnology - What is it and what does it mean?

These questions are probably asked by many, especially younger people. But even older age groups might find themselves in unprecedented circumstances when they are presented with terms such as enzyme, gene or plasmid. Keeping this in mind, we have made it our task to evoke some long overdue change in this respect. For this, we developed several projects that all contribute to a better understanding of synthetic biology (SynBio). Admittedly, science communication is not only a topic in SynBio, but of all other sciences as well, but we decided to lay our focus on what we know best.

We tried to reach the widest possible audience with our projects. In order to achieve this, first of all we had to gain an overview of the already existing knowledge in the minds of the broad masses which we managed to accomplish by an online survey with 292 participants. We have also taken up this issue in a livestream on social media which we carried out together with the iGEM Team Kaiserslautern, in order to publicly provide further information about topics of synthetic biology for those interested.

We also created a podcast called "Genomenal" which is aimed at people of all ages who would like to learn more about biotechnology and iGEM. “Genomenal” can be found on Spotify, our university website and on our wiki. We have also thought of something for the younger part of society. Together with Aleksa Zecevic (click here), we have developed a mini-game called “The Genomenal Adventures of Dr. W”, which introduces biological practices in a playful and amusing way.

Last but not least, we also wanted to explicitly address students in the upper grades who might be thinking about a future career pathway in biology. For this, we have worked together with the Kurt-Schumacher-Schule in Karben. For this school, we hosted a zoom call in which we introduced the topic of iGEM to an advanced course for biology. We reported about our experiences and gave tips regarding our studies of biology and chemistry with the hope to enthuse them for scientifical studies. (click here)

Our Survey – the basis for our Science Communication

We wanted to find out the reasons for concerns regarding synthetic biology and GMOs, because we think that many of these are based on lacking knowledge. Therefore, we created a survey and reached almost 300 people. What does the public know about synthetic biology? Do they have a clue what is behind this term? What advantages and, more importantly, what risks do they think of when they hear this term?
Besides that, we were curious how the public estimates the problem of micropollutants in our waters and what they think of our solution. By doing this survey we also tried to reach awareness for these topics into people’s daily lives.

Results:

While about 80 percent can imagine what a genetically modified organism is, only 53 percent have an idea what synthetic biology could be. When asked if they have ever been in contact with a GMO before, almost one quarter answered that they don’t know. We specified the question by asking if they had ever consumed something that was produced by using GMOs. The number of participants who were not sure about that was not much lower. As these numbers are quite high and regarding that the 292 people we reached are no perfectly representative sample, there is a task we can get from our survey. One part of our project involved doing science communication. We aimed to reach more people not related to our university or scientific work. Since the COVID-19 pandemic made it really difficult to address people on the street, for example, we decided to focus on other projects like our podcast "Genomenal" and a minigame.
At least 90 percent of all participants told us that they definitely see a threat in the wastewater pollution by pharmaceutical residues. By asking if they think it’s alright to bring a GMO into a wastewater treatment plant, we found that about 70 percent have concerns regarding this idea or at least would not agree completely. Following this question, we asked these participants the same question but under the condition that our GMO will leave the waste water treatment plant under no circumstances. By this addition we were able to lower the disagreement. Only 45 percent of the interviewees still had concerns.
In the end of our survey we asked them about advantages they see in synthetic biology. About 80 percent of the participants told us that they see future applications especially in environmental protection and medicine. Since there was also the option ‘in none of these areas’ this result leaves us in a positive mood!

Our Podcast Genomenal