Team:GA State SW Jiaotong/Results

GSU & SWJT iGEM

  • Everyone decided their groups.
  • Learned the plan and read articles generally to know the current progress.
  • Came up with the general ideas to achieve bleaching resistance.(1)
  • Discussed the ways to operate, such as CRISPR and iRNA. But Dr. Brewer analyzed their strength and weakness. The two ways are not suitable for this project.(1)
  • (1)

  • Set up Wechat group to ensure easy and timely communication in COVID-19 situation.(1)
  • Read many papers about transcriptome of Symbiodinium.
  • Found Gene microarray branch companies and price of transcriptome measurement.
  • Searched and compared the feasibility and finally planned to use microarray to test the genes’ expression between normal and high temperature situation to find the key resistant gene.(2)
  • Found the genome information of Symbiodium (SRR9613609) and Dunaliella from CNGBdp and NCBI.(3)(4)
  • Discussed methods to compare and find resistant gene
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)
    (4)

  • Found and shared the most useful paper.(1)(2)(3)
  • Made the waiting list of resistant genes from that paper.(4)
  • Did a heat map to compare easily based on the data in this paper.(5)
  • Don’t need to do sequence!
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)
    (4)
    (5)

  • Came up with and analyzed some selecting ways of these genes (Pathways, Differences’ degree, Phylogenetic Trees).
  • Found more information, such as protein sequence of these genes. (1)
  • Another useful paper.(2)(3)(4)
  • Searched some tools to do the pathway and Phylogenetic Trees screening, such as KEGG, TBtools, MEGA and iTOL and so on.
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)
    (4)

  • Learned and discussed the difference between Orthologous gene and Paralogous gene in phylogenetic trees.(1)(2)
  • Discussed the different role of phylogenetic trees in screening down and up regulation genes.
  • Need read more papers to decide up or down one gene to achieve the goal
  • (1)
    (2)

  • Did research on every waiting list gene’s functions from NCBI papers and GO database.(1)(2)(3)
  • Excluded some genes whose major functions are not relevant to heat-resistance.(4)(5)
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)
    (4)
    (5)

  • Did more research on “not recommended genes” and “possible genes” to exclude genes due to feasibility.(1)
  • Compared two important papers and found the similarity in genes.(2)
  • (1)
    (2)

  • Pathways and interaction relationships of the final genes from KEGG and String. Excluded genes that pathways are not clearly or could not be found from database.(1)(2)(3)
  • HSF is the upstream gene of HSP70 and HSP90 and also DnaJ, which are mentioned in the two papers. So it’s a possible gene to use.
  • HSF Types’ introduction, we needed to ensure if it’s A type that can regulate the expression of HSP and DnaJ independently.
  • Found more clear information of genome sequence.
  • (1)
    (2)

  • Found many websites and papers about HSF types and promoter analysis (HSEAT). Prepared some A type HSF organisms to do BLAST. (1)(2)
  • After the discussion with Professor Zhou, we found it’s the wrong direction! We need to find HSP types.
  • Discuss what kinds of the symbiodium clades that we are cultured to ensure the genome database.(3)
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)

  • Introduced the IGEM calendar and divided the detailed work.
  • Was in HSP problems. It’s hard to find papers about it.
  • Found the nucleotide sequence and promoter sequence of HSP.
  • Solved the “type problem”!
  • Found the HSE sequence and the difference between the three types of HSP.(1)
  • After the comparison, can ensure the HSP in symbiodium is A type, which means we can regulate HSF gene to achieve the goal.(2)(3)(4)
  • (1)
    (2)
    (3)
    (4)

  • Build a phylogenetic tree about heat shock protein to see the relationships.(1)
  • Prepared human practice.
  • (1)