Difference between revisions of "Team:UCopenhagen/Attributions"
VictoriaTR (Talk | contribs) |
VictoriaTR (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
</div class="container-flex"> | </div class="container-flex"> | ||
| − | + | then write some text about everyone else at plen who has supported us | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
<div><h1>Human practice support</h1> | <div><h1>Human practice support</h1> | ||
| + | balbla - we would like to thank everyone in our hP - check out our integrated human practice. | ||
| + | -Did anyone help us with understandin human practice? | ||
| − | + | thank synthetics for helping us understand HP and how to incorporate it. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div><h1>Funding & Entrepreneurship support</h1> | <div><h1>Funding & Entrepreneurship support</h1> | ||
| + | |||
| + | We would like to thank SUND Hub, the innovation and incubation hub for start-up coming out of the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, for allowing us to be part of their annual SUND Hub Incubator Program and giving us opportunities to meet people who can help us develop a business model and methods to target customers. We would especially like to thank Peter Løvschall and Anna Vestergård Jacobsen, who are currently heading the place. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We would also like to thank Peter for putting us in touch with Nina Brocks, who is an innovation consultant at Region Hovedstaden. She understood our project and needs and helped us fill in the gaps by putting us in contact with Jakob Seidelin, about whom you can read more on here (link to IHP). | ||
<div class="container-flex"> | <div class="container-flex"> | ||
Revision as of 12:22, 16 October 2020
Attributions
Our accomplishments
how did we form our idea, is our iGEM team a course, when did we brainsotrm, when did we get into lab, what have we accomplished. "Use this page to attribute work done on your project. This includes the work done by each of the student members on your team and any work that was done by people outside of your team, including the host labs, advisors, instructors, and individuals not on the team roster. This requirement is not about literature references - these can and should be displayed throughout your wiki."Our project on a timeline
At KU, iGEM is not a course, but an independent team project guided by PLEN department employees. We started our project XXX date. We brainstormed until finally choosing our project on XX date. Through a contiunous shuffeling between human practice research and interviews and scientific development and innovation throughout the summer... we have succeeded in completing our project to the best of our combined efforts.... Due to the pandemic we have worked almost half of the iGEM period solely online, meeting through zoom. We managed to get into lab on XXXX date, and worked hard from there to complete most of our planned experiments.....Lab
Everyone on our team has helped out in the lab, cloning yeast, making colonies, doing PCRs or DNA extraction????? However our two main lab coordinators Emil and David have been instrumental for the success of our experiments!Project Management
We have had a non-hierachical team structure, thus everyone has been part of all main decision on the team, and our focus has been on a collected managmenet of our project and shared responsibilities. That being said, our project coordinators Aje and Jan has allowed the team to flourish by taking on the hard responsibilities of deadlines and planning...Wiki
Everyone on our team has written the wiki! Without the contributions from everybody the wiki would not have been what it is today. Still, we would like to attribute the main design and structure of our wiki to our wiki coordinators Aje and Victoria. They have pulled a heavy load, learning how to code in different languages so that we can all share our results in style!Human practice
everyone has been aprt of shaping the pathway for our human practice. The main work has been done by our HP coordinators Endre, Ignacio and Shivani...Dry lab
Although the modelling goals have been formulated in a shared effort, the excecution of our modelling work has been carried out in great deal by our main dry lab coordinator Vit, with help in parts from Aje, Jan and David.Funding & Entrepreneurship
Although many of us contributed in various ways to the funding efforts, we would like to attribute our success in part to the funding coordinators Victoria and Ignacio, who with help from the rest of the funding team, Vit and Endre, carried out majority of our funding applications. All four in addition to shivani also contributed to the entrepreneurship completed in the project.Outreach
Thanks to our coordinator Shivani for managing our social media and outreach. Blog-shivani, insta-Aje, twitter-Emil, LinkedIn-jan.Example
The name of the person
positioninfo texts about the person
Project support and advice
Principal investigators
Sotirios Kampranis,
Associate Professor at PLEN, University of CopenhagenAs our primary PI, Sotirios has been a big part of our project. He has guided us through our brainstorming process with valuable input on applicability and viability. He has been a mentor in many aspects, but most prominantly in the design and experimental set-up of our project as well as team funding. His group at PLEN has provided us with workspace, consumables, training and guidance.
Karel Miettinen,
Postdoc at PLEN, University of CopenhagenAs our secondary PI, Karel has been very invested in our project. We have been in daily contact with him regarding all matters of scientific planning. He has provided us with immense scientific guiding and an uplifting spirit in the lab. He knows all there is to know about yeast, and his well of knowledge has helped the lab team advance throughout the project.
Advisers and instructors
Nanna Heinz,
Center coordinator at PLEN University of CopenhagenNanna has been our team mentor throughout the year. She has helped us establish trust in the team and define a strucutre in which we could all be an equal part of the team and project direction. She has been an important part of our daily iGEM life, guiding our idea process, setting up meeting-structures, and facilitating a healthy, independent team environment. She has offered her advice on a number of issues throughout the project and aided a great deal in our management of iGEM deadlines and deliverables.
Jon Fugl,
Ph.D at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (InCell 2017)Jon used his experience as an iGEMer to guide us during our idea development phase. He has provided us with valuable advice and support, even hosting a workshop for us on biobricks early on in our process.
Cecilie Cetti Hansen,
Ph.D at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (UNIK 2014)Cecilie is a former iGEM member has experience with mentoring in multiple aspects of an iGEM project. She has given us valuable advice on how to go about human practices, Wiki, and outreach.
Nattawat Leelahakorn,
Ph.D at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (PharMARSy, 2018)Nattawat has helped the lab team immensely with everything from troubleshooting, mastering new techniques and finding the right materials in lab. We are thankful that he was there to help us out even when we were working till late at night!
Jonas,
Master student at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (Ovulaid, 2019)Jonas has been instrumental in helping us navigate in the lab and has share his experience from last year to help us make 'new' mistakes.
Iben,
Master student at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (Ovulaid, 2019)Iben gave us extensive advice on funding, management, human practices as well as outreach and sat in on a few meetings to help guide us. She has provided us with a lot of moral support!
Ojas,
Master student at PLEN, University of Copenhagen and former iGEMer (Ovulaid, 2019)Has he only helped us as an ambassador?
General support at PLEN
everyone else at plen Tilla Augusta Engelsted,
Laboratory Coordinator, PLENTilla has been extremely helpful in giving the iGEM team safety tours and ensuring we had access to registers where we could order any lab materials we needed. She was also instrumental in giving us access to the lab so that the entire team could try some science in action whilst adhering to the restrictions due to Covid-19!
Jette
hjælp til konti og funding?
Human practice support
balbla - we would like to thank everyone in our hP - check out our integrated human practice. -Did anyone help us with understandin human practice? thank synthetics for helping us understand HP and how to incorporate it.Funding & Entrepreneurship support
We would like to thank SUND Hub, the innovation and incubation hub for start-up coming out of the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, for allowing us to be part of their annual SUND Hub Incubator Program and giving us opportunities to meet people who can help us develop a business model and methods to target customers. We would especially like to thank Peter Løvschall and Anna Vestergård Jacobsen, who are currently heading the place. We would also like to thank Peter for putting us in touch with Nina Brocks, who is an innovation consultant at Region Hovedstaden. She understood our project and needs and helped us fill in the gaps by putting us in contact with Jakob Seidelin, about whom you can read more on here (link to IHP). Caroline,
info texts to the img
Sund hub people,
info texts to the img
Lab and modelling support
DTU igemmer,
helped our understanding of modelling and dry lab. Workshop about characterization and standardization of parts.
Kurt mikkelsen og Andreas?,
Helped us with access to supercomputer for modeling rosetta data?
Sponsors
thanks to all our sponsors here. they will be in a footer type manner. No writing required.★ ALERT!
This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the medal criterion or award listed below.
Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.
Attributions
Use this page to attribute work done on your project. This includes the work done by each of the student members on your team and any work that was done by people outside of your team, including the host labs, advisors, instructors, and individuals not on the team roster. This requirement is not about literature references - these can and should be displayed throughout your wiki.
Bronze Medal Criterion #2
Describe what work your team members did and what other people did for your project.
Please see the Medals requirements page for more details.
What should this page contain?
- Clearly state what the team accomplished
- General Support
- Project support and advice
- Fundraising help and advice
- Lab support
- Difficult technique support
- Project advisor support
- Wiki support
- Presentation coaching
- Human Practices support
- Thanks and acknowledgements for all other people involved in helping make a successful iGEM team
Tell us if your institution teaches an iGEM or synthetic biology class and when you started your project:
- Does your institution teach an iGEM or synthetic biology course?
- When did you start this course?
- Are the syllabus and course materials freely available online?
- When did you start your brainstorming?
- When did you start in the lab?
- When did you start working on your project?
Inspiration
Take a look at what other teams have done:
- 2011 Imperial College London (scroll to the bottom)
- 2014 Exeter
- 2014 Melbourne
- 2014 Valencia Biocampus
Why is this page needed?
The Attribution requirement helps the judges know what you did yourselves and what you had help with. You can get help with difficult or complex techniques, but you must report what work your team did and what work was done by others.
For example, you might choose to work with an animal model during your project. Working with animals requires getting a license and applying far in advance to conduct certain experiments in many countries. This is difficult to achieve during the course of a summer, but much easier if you can work with a postdoc or PI who has the right licenses.
Can we base our project on a previous one?
Yes! You can have a project based on a previous team, or based on someone else's idea, as long as you state this fact very clearly and give credit for the original project.