Difference between revisions of "Team:CCU Taiwan/Education"

m
m
Line 108: Line 108:
 
             <p>We found that their <b>access to science education was limited</b> and their <b>participation in science was low</b> (<a href="https://2020.igem.org/Team:CCU_Taiwan/Inclusion" target="_blank">More information on Inclusivity</a>). Thus, what we wanted to fulfil by working with them was <b>popularization and equalization of science</b>. After discussing our desire for a couple weeks, the principal of Ming Yang High School accepted our idea and offered us a hard-to-come-by opportunity to conduct a two-day course.</p>
 
             <p>We found that their <b>access to science education was limited</b> and their <b>participation in science was low</b> (<a href="https://2020.igem.org/Team:CCU_Taiwan/Inclusion" target="_blank">More information on Inclusivity</a>). Thus, what we wanted to fulfil by working with them was <b>popularization and equalization of science</b>. After discussing our desire for a couple weeks, the principal of Ming Yang High School accepted our idea and offered us a hard-to-come-by opportunity to conduct a two-day course.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>From the outset, we drew up an outline for our course and received feedback from the director of academic affairs. They thought that our course was too hard for their students as most of them only had an educational level of middle school or even primary school even in ages of normal university students. Following their suggestions, we made some adjustments, starting by talking about <b>genes</b>, which is basic knowledge in biology. First, we introduced animals with different appearance, habitats and diet habits to show them the genetic diversity due to genes. We explained that although genes have a great influence on the diversity of species, there are only subtle differences in DNA sequences, so humans have significant similarity in genes compared with many species. They couldn’t believe that a banana shows 50% similarity in genes with a human, while a fruit fly shows 60% similarity!</p>
+
             <p>From the outset, we drew up an outline for our course and received feedback from the director of academic affairs. They thought that our course was too hard for their students as most of them only had an educational level of middle school or even primary school although in ages of normal university students. Following their suggestions, we made some adjustments, starting by talking about <b>genes</b>, which is basic knowledge in biology. First, we introduced animals with different appearance, habitats and diet habits to show them the genetic diversity due to genes. We explained that although genes have a great influence on the diversity of species, there are only subtle differences in DNA sequences, so humans have significant similarity in genes compared with many species. They couldn’t believe that a banana shows 50% similarity in genes with a human, while a fruit fly shows 60% similarity!</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <p>We introduced the <b>structure of DNA</b> through the activity of <b>constructing a DNA model</b> using straws and adhesive tape. Due to the restriction on materials that could be brought into the classroom, precision instruments like a microscope were not allowed. Thus, we hosted a simplified <b>extraction experiment of fruit DNA</b> so they could see what DNA looks like in a simple way. They found it intriguing as they had never done an experiment before.</p>
 
             <p>We introduced the <b>structure of DNA</b> through the activity of <b>constructing a DNA model</b> using straws and adhesive tape. Due to the restriction on materials that could be brought into the classroom, precision instruments like a microscope were not allowed. Thus, we hosted a simplified <b>extraction experiment of fruit DNA</b> so they could see what DNA looks like in a simple way. They found it intriguing as they had never done an experiment before.</p>

Revision as of 13:07, 27 October 2020

Science Communication