Difference between revisions of "Team:CCU Taiwan/Results"

m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
         <li onclick="display1('epro')"><a href="#epro">Envelope Protein</a></li>
 
         <li onclick="display1('epro')"><a href="#epro">Envelope Protein</a></li>
 
         <li onclick="display1('cle')"><a href="#cle">CLEC5A</a></li>
 
         <li onclick="display1('cle')"><a href="#cle">CLEC5A</a></li>
         <li onclick="display1('con')"><a href="#con">Conjugations of primary amines to the glass fiber membranes</a></li>
+
         <li onclick="display1('con')"><a href="#con">Conjugations of Primary Amines to the Glass Fiber Membranes</a></li>
 
         <li onclick="display1('avo')"><a href="#avo">Gold Nanoparticles</a></li>
 
         <li onclick="display1('avo')"><a href="#avo">Gold Nanoparticles</a></li>
 
     </ul>
 
     </ul>
Line 119: Line 119:
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>We prepared pET-29a(+) as the vector for expressing E protein and confirmed in Figure 7 that plasmid extraction shows the size of pET-29a(+) is about 5,000 bp, which is close to the theoretical size, 5,371 bp. Also, we transformed the pET-29a(+)_E protein into DH5α and check the transformation using colony PCR. Figure 8 shows the size of E protein with two HA tags, and T7 promoter and terminator is about 2000 bp, close to the theoretical size of 1903 bp.</p>
+
             <p>We prepared pET-29a(+) as the vector for expressing E protein and confirmed in Figure 7 that plasmid extraction shows the size of pET-29a(+) is about 5,000 bp, which is close to the theoretical size, 5,371 bp. Also, we transformed the pET-29a(+)_E protein into DH5α and check the transformation using colony PCR. Figure 8 shows the size of E protein with two HA tags, and T7 promoter and terminator is about 2,000 bp, close to the theoretical size of 1,903 bp.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
Line 128: Line 128:
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c9/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results8.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c9/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results8.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 8. Colony PCR of pET-29a(+)_E protein, which has a size of about 2000 bp, containing E protein with two HA tags, and T7 promoter and terminator. M = DNA marker.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 8. Colony PCR of pET-29a(+)_E protein, which has a size of about 2,000 bp, containing E protein with two HA tags, and T7 promoter and terminator. M = DNA marker.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>pET-29a(+)_E protein was then transformed to BL21(DE3), cultured with 3 ml medium at 37 °C, and induced with 1.8 ml bacteria and 1 mM IPTG for 2 hours. Figure 9 shows the results from four different colonies with and without induction. The strong bands shown between 63 and 75 kDa indicate expression of the E protein with the two HA tags, which has a size of 70 kDa. However, there is no significant difference between non-induction and induction samples, and we are trying to improve the expression. Also, the bacterial culture was lysed with sonication, then separated with a high-speed centrifuge. It indicates that E protein found in the supernatant in Figure 10. We will keep doing Western blot based on the HA tag, which is part of pET29a(+) to prove that E protein expressed correctly.</p>
+
             <p>pET-29a(+)_E protein was then transformed to BL21(DE3), cultured with 3 ml medium at 37 °C, and induced with 1.8 ml bacteria and 1 mM IPTG for 2 hours. Figure 9 shows the results from four different colonies with and without induction. The weak bands from 63 to 48 kDa indicate the E protein expression with the HA tag, which has a size of 61.2 kDa. However, it is too hard to see, and we are trying to improve the expression. Also, the bacterial culture was lysed with sonication, then separated with a high-speed centrifuge. It indicates that E protein found in the supernatant in Figure 10. The results were also confirmed using Western blot based on the HA tag, which is part of pET-29a(+). Figure 11 shows that the anti-His tag binds to the His tag, suggesting that the protein expression was successful.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/e/e8/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results15.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/e/e8/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results15.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 9. SDS-PAGE of E protein from a small-scale culture. After induction with IPTG, the strong bands at about 70 kDa indicate the expressing of E protein. M = protein marker. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 9. SDS-PAGE of E protein from a small-scale culture. After induction with IPTG, the strong bands at about 61.270 kDa indicate the expressing of E protein. M = protein marker. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/9/90/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results16.png">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/9/90/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results16.png">
                 <p>Figure 10. SDS-PAGE of CLEC5A small-scale expression. The bacterial solution was lysed with sonication and separated with a high-speed centrifuge. The results indicate E protein is expressed in the supernatant. M = protein marker. Sup. = supernatant.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 10. SDS-PAGE of E protein from a small-scale expression. The bacterial solution was lysed with sonication and separated with a high-speed centrifuge. The results indicate E protein is expressed in the supernatant. M = protein marker. Sup. = supernatant.</p>
 +
            </div>
 +
            <br>
 +
            <div id="imginfo">
 +
                <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/e/ed/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results11new.jpg">
 +
                <p>Figure 11. Western blot of E protein. An anti-His tag was used to bind to the His tag on the E protein. The stronger band on the both non-induction and induction lanes suggests the experiments were successful. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
Line 147: Line 152:
 
         <section id="cle" style="display:none">
 
         <section id="cle" style="display:none">
 
             <h2>CLEC5A</h2>
 
             <h2>CLEC5A</h2>
             <p>A plasmid containing the CLEC5A extracellular domain with a Myc tag was obtained from OriGene Technologies. The CLEC5A extracellular domain and Myc tag were amplified using PCR. Figure 11 shows that the sequence of the CLEC5A extracellular domain with a Myc tag were amplified successfully, with a size of 564 bp.  
+
             <p>A plasmid containing the CLEC5A extracellular domain with a Myc tag was obtained from OriGene Technologies. The CLEC5A extracellular domain and Myc tag were amplified using PCR. Figure 12 shows that the sequence of the CLEC5A extracellular domain with a Myc tag were amplified successfully, with a size of 564 bp.  
pET-29b(+) was prepared successfully as a vector, as shown in Figure 12, with a theoretical size of 5,370 bp. pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A was obtained by inserting the CLEC5A into pET-29b(+) and then transforming it into DH5α which was confirmed using colony PCR.</p>
+
pET-29b(+) was prepared successfully as a vector, as shown in Figure 13, with a theoretical size of 5,370 bp. pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A was obtained by inserting the CLEC5A into pET-29b(+) and then transforming it into DH5α which was confirmed using colony PCR.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/7/76/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results9.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/7/76/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results9.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 11. CLEC5A with a Myc tag, matching the expected size of about 600 bp. M = DNA marker.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 12. CLEC5A with a Myc tag, matching the expected size of about 600 bp. M = DNA marker.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8c/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results10.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/8/8c/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results10.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 12. Plasmid extraction of pET-29b(+), matching the expected size of about 5,000 bp. M = DNA marker.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 13. Plasmid extraction of pET-29b(+), matching the expected size of about 5,000 bp. M = DNA marker.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>Figure 13 shows the size of CLEC5A extracellular domain with Myc tag, and T7 promoter and terminator is about 900 bp, close to the theoretical size of 904 bp.</p>
+
             <p>Figure 14 shows the size of CLEC5A extracellular domain with Myc tag, and T7 promoter and terminator is about 900 bp, close to the theoretical size of 904 bp.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c1/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results11.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c1/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results11.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 13. Colony PCR of pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A, which has an expected size of about 900 bp including the CLEC5A extracellular domain and Myc tag and T7 promoter and terminator. M = DNA marker.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 14. Colony PCR of pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A, which has an expected size of about 900 bp including the CLEC5A extracellular domain and Myc tag and T7 promoter and terminator. M = DNA marker.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A was then transformed to BL21(DE3) and induced to express protein with 1.8 ml bacteria and 1 mM IPTG for 2 hours. Figure 14 shows the results from four different colonies with and without induction. The strong bands from 28 to 35 kDa indicate expression of the CLEC5A extracellular domain with the Myc tag, which has a size of 33 kDa. The results were also confirmed using Western blot based on the HA tag, which is part of pET-29b(+). Figure 15 shows that the anti-His tag binds to the His tag, suggesting that the protein expression was successful.</p>
+
             <p>pET-29b(+)_CLEC5A was then transformed to BL21(DE3) and induced to express protein with 1.8 ml bacteria and 1 mM IPTG for 2 hours. Figure 15 shows the results from four different colonies with and without induction. The strong bands near 28 kDa indicate expression of the CLEC5A extracellular domain with the Myc tag, which has a size of 26.6 kDa. The results were also confirmed using Western blot based on the HA tag, which is part of pET-29b(+). Figure 16 shows that the anti-His tag binds to the His tag, suggesting that the protein expression was successful.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/0/02/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results12.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/0/02/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results12.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 14. SDS-PAGE of CLEC5A from a small-scale culture. After induction with IPTG, the strong bands at about 33 kDa indicate the expressing of CLEC5A. M = protein marker. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 15. SDS-PAGE of CLEC5A from a small-scale culture. After induction with IPTG, the strong bands at about 26.6 kDa indicate the expressing of CLEC5A. M = protein marker. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/5/56/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results13.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/5/56/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results13.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 15. Western blot of CLEC5A. An anti-His tag was used to bind to the His tag on the CLEC5A protein. The stronger band on the induction lanes suggests the experiments were successful. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 16. Western blot of CLEC5A. An anti-His tag was used to bind to the His tag on the CLEC5A protein. The stronger band on the induction lanes suggests the experiments were successful. NI = Non-Induction. I = Induction.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>Finally, we expressed CLEC5A on a large scale. The bacterial culture was lysed using a French press, then separated with a high-speed centrifuge. Figure 16 indicates CLEC5A is always found in the pellets no matter how long they were induced.</p>
+
             <p>Finally, we expressed CLEC5A on a large scale. The bacterial culture was lysed using a French press, then separated with a high-speed centrifuge. Figure 17 indicates CLEC5A is always found in the pellets no matter how long they were induced.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/7/79/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results14.jpg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/7/79/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results14.jpg">
                 <p>Figure 16. SDS-PAGE of CLEC5A large-scale expression. The protein was induced for 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours, separately. The bacterial solution was lysed with a French press and separated with a high-speed centrifuge. The results indicate CLEC5A is always expressed in the pellet under these conditions. M = protein marker. Sup. = supernatant.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 17. SDS-PAGE of CLEC5A large-scale expression. The protein was induced for 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours, separately. The bacterial solution was lysed with a French press and separated with a high-speed centrifuge. The results indicate CLEC5A is always expressed in the pellet under these conditions. M = protein marker. Sup. = supernatant.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
         </section>
 
         </section>
Line 189: Line 194:
 
         <section id="con" style="display:none">
 
         <section id="con" style="display:none">
 
             <h2>Conjugations of Primary Amines to the Glass Fiber Membranes</h2>
 
             <h2>Conjugations of Primary Amines to the Glass Fiber Membranes</h2>
             <p>We expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mock E protein to show that that after modification, the glass fiber membrane can bind to the primary amines (side-chain amines) from a peptide or protein. We appreciate Mingdao iGEM 2020, who generously provided us with a plasmid containing the green fluorescent protein gene (GFPmut1, BBa_K1159311). The modified glass fiber membranes were immersed in GFP supernatant from the culture medium for 30 mins to form amide bonds. To verify that the experiments work, we measured the intensity of the fluorescence from GFP using a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (also provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). The intensity of membrane reaction with 0.5x and 1x GFP supernatant are shown in Figure 17. We carefully washed the membranes with double-distilled water after the reaction. The intensity was about twice as strong in the 1x supernatant as the 0.5x one, suggesting the conjugation experiments were successful. We also performed the same experiment with non-modified glass fiber membranes as a control, and the intensity of fluorescence is within the range of measurement error.</p>
+
             <p>We expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mock E protein to show that that after modification, the glass fiber membrane can bind to the primary amines (side-chain amines) from a peptide or protein. We appreciate Mingdao iGEM 2020, who generously provided us with a plasmid containing the green fluorescent protein gene (GFPmut1, BBa_K1159311). The modified glass fiber membranes were immersed in GFP supernatant from the culture medium for 30 mins to form amide bonds. To verify that the experiments work, we measured the intensity of the fluorescence from GFP using a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (also provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). The intensity of membrane reaction with 0.5x and 1x GFP supernatant are shown in Figure 18. We carefully washed the membranes with double-distilled water after the reaction. The intensity was about twice as strong in the 1x supernatant as the 0.5x one, suggesting the conjugation experiments were successful. We also performed the same experiment with non-modified glass fiber membranes as a control, and the intensity of fluorescence is within the range of measurement error.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c6/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl1.png">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c6/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl1.png">
                 <p>Figure 17. Fluorescence from modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 1x GFP stock, modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 0.5x GFP stock, and non-modified glass fiber membranes (control).</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 18. Fluorescence from modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 1x GFP stock, modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 0.5x GFP stock, and non-modified glass fiber membranes (control).</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>We also confirmed the reactivity of glass fiber membranes to amines using DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) by measuring the fluorescence spectra with a plate reader (provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). We used the same coupling conditions for GFP. Figure 18 shows that with the modification, the emission has a 0.5-fold enhancement in DNA conjugation.</p>
+
             <p>We also confirmed the reactivity of glass fiber membranes to amines using DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) by measuring the fluorescence spectra with a plate reader (provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). We used the same coupling conditions for GFP. Figure 19 shows that with the modification, the emission has a 0.5-fold enhancement in DNA conjugation.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/3/38/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl2.png">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/3/38/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl2.png">
                 <p>Figure 18. The fluorescence spectra of DNA conjugated glass fiber membrane (blue), the control experiment (red), in which DNAs react with non-modified membranes, and the empty well (yellow). The spectra were obtained at an excitation of 320 nm.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 19. The fluorescence spectra of DNA conjugated glass fiber membrane (blue), the control experiment (red), in which DNAs react with non-modified membranes, and the empty well (yellow). The spectra were obtained at an excitation of 320 nm.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
Line 208: Line 213:
 
             <h2>Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)</h2>
 
             <h2>Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs)</h2>
 
             <h3>Avoiding the aggregation of AuNPs</h3>
 
             <h3>Avoiding the aggregation of AuNPs</h3>
             <p>To conjugate the peptides to the AuNPs, pre-treatment of the AuNPs is necessary. However, during this process, aggregation of AuNPs could happen, which would result in failure of the experiment. We measured the sizes of AuNPs using dynamic light scattering shown in Figure 19.</p>
+
             <p>To conjugate the peptides to the AuNPs, pre-treatment of the AuNPs is necessary. However, during this process, aggregation of AuNPs could happen, which would result in failure of the experiment. We measured the sizes of AuNPs using dynamic light scattering shown in Figure 20.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <p>First, we used MUA/MCH to modify 13-nm AuNPs by adding carboxylic groups to the surface. However, the AuNPs aggregated to a size of about 1,800 nm after we applied the EDC/NHS treatment. We found that if we replaced EDC with DCC, the size of AuNPs aggregation was reduced to about 350 nm. But 350 nm is not small enough, so we further tried replacing MUA/MCH with MHA /SB thiol, which was then treated with EDC/NHS. We obtained a significantly smaller size of 90 nm. We used these particles for the following experiments.</p>
 
             <p>First, we used MUA/MCH to modify 13-nm AuNPs by adding carboxylic groups to the surface. However, the AuNPs aggregated to a size of about 1,800 nm after we applied the EDC/NHS treatment. We found that if we replaced EDC with DCC, the size of AuNPs aggregation was reduced to about 350 nm. But 350 nm is not small enough, so we further tried replacing MUA/MCH with MHA /SB thiol, which was then treated with EDC/NHS. We obtained a significantly smaller size of 90 nm. We used these particles for the following experiments.</p>
Line 214: Line 219:
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/d/dd/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl3.png.png">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/d/dd/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl3.png.png">
                 <p>Figure 19. The size distributions of AuNPs modified using MUA/MCH + EDC/NHS (blue), modified using MUA/MCH + DCC/NHS (red), and modified using MHA/SB thiol + EDC/NHS (yellow)</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 20. The size distributions of AuNPs modified using MUA/MCH + EDC/NHS (blue), modified using MUA/MCH + DCC/NHS (red), and modified using MHA/SB thiol + EDC/NHS (yellow)</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
Line 222: Line 227:
 
             <p>As a proof of concept that we are able to form the covalent bonds between the primary amines (from the PTRS) and AuNPs, we tried to conjugate the DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) with the modified AuNPs.</p>
 
             <p>As a proof of concept that we are able to form the covalent bonds between the primary amines (from the PTRS) and AuNPs, we tried to conjugate the DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) with the modified AuNPs.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>We used Raman spectrometer verify if the experiments worked. We found that with the DNA conjugation, the Raman signals have a significant decrease (Figure 20). Although we have no model to explain this effect, we believe it resulted from interactions with the DNA, suggesting DNA can bind to AuNPs.</p>
+
             <p>We used Raman spectrometer verify if the experiments worked. We found that with the DNA conjugation, the Raman signals have a significant decrease (Figure 21). Although we have no model to explain this effect, we believe it resulted from interactions with the DNA, suggesting DNA can bind to AuNPs.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/a/aa/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl4.png">
 
                 <img id="imginfo2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/a/aa/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl4.png">
                 <p>Figure 20. The Raman spectra of DCC/NHS modified AuNPs (yellow), and DCC/NHS modified AuNPs conjugated with 1 μM (blue) and 0.1 μM (red) DNA primers.</p>
+
                 <p>Figure 21. The Raman spectra of DCC/NHS modified AuNPs (yellow), and DCC/NHS modified AuNPs conjugated with 1 μM (blue) and 0.1 μM (red) DNA primers.</p>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>

Latest revision as of 09:04, 13 December 2020

Results