Difference between revisions of "Team:UCopenhagen/Attributions"
VictoriaTR (Talk | contribs) |
VictoriaTR (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
.pic-div{ | .pic-div{ | ||
flex: 1; | flex: 1; | ||
| + | display: flex; | ||
| + | align-items: center; | ||
| + | |||
} | } | ||
| Line 95: | Line 98: | ||
.text-div{ | .text-div{ | ||
flex: 5; | flex: 5; | ||
| − | padding-top: | + | padding-top: 2%; |
} | } | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 13 October 2020
Attributions
Our accomplishments
how did we form our idea, is our iGEM team a course, when did we brainsotrm, when did we get into lab, what have we accomplished. "Use this page to attribute work done on your project. This includes the work done by each of the student members on your team and any work that was done by people outside of your team, including the host labs, advisors, instructors, and individuals not on the team roster. This requirement is not about literature references - these can and should be displayed throughout your wiki."Example
The name of the person
positioninfo texts about the person
Project support and advice
Principal investigators
Sotirios Kampranis,
Associate Professor at PLEN, University of CopenhagenAs our primary PI, Sotirios has been a big part of our project. He has guided us through our brainstorming process with valuable input on applicability and viability. He has been a mentor in many aspects, but most prominantly in the design and experimental set-up of our project as well as team funding. His group at PLEN has provided us with workspace, consumables, training and guidance.
Karel Miettinen,
Postdoc at PLEN, University of CopenhagenAs our secondary PI, Karel has been very invested in our project. We have been in daily contact with him regarding all matters of scientific planning. He has provided us with immense scientific guiding and an uplifting spirit in the lab. He knows all there is to know about yeast, and his well of knowledge has helped the lab team advance throughout the project.
Advisers and instructors
Nanna Heinz,
Center coordinator at PLEN University of CopenhagenNanna has been our team mentor throughout the year. She has helped us establish trust in the team and define a strucutre in which we could all be an equal part of the team and project direction. She has been an important part of our daily iGEM life, guiding our idea process, setting up meeting-structures, and facilitating a healthy, independent team environment. She has offered her advice on a number of issues throughout the project and aided a great deal in our management of iGEM deadlines and deliverables.
Jon,
info texts to the img
Cecilie,
info texts to the img
Nattawat,
info texts to the img
Jonas,
info texts to the img
Iben,
info texts to the img
General support at PLEN
everyone else at plen Tilla,
Vi fik intro til lab
Jette
hjælp til konti og funding?
Kirsten Jørgensen?
safety approval of our proeject?
Human practice support
Jon,
info texts to the img
Entrepreneurship support
Lab and modeling support
DTU igemmer,
helped our understanding of modelling and dry lab. Workshop about characterization and standardization of parts.
Kurt mikkelsen og Andreas?,
Helped us with access to supercomputer for modeling rosetta data?
★ ALERT!
This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the medal criterion or award listed below.
Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at Instructions for Pages for awards.
Attributions
Use this page to attribute work done on your project. This includes the work done by each of the student members on your team and any work that was done by people outside of your team, including the host labs, advisors, instructors, and individuals not on the team roster. This requirement is not about literature references - these can and should be displayed throughout your wiki.
Bronze Medal Criterion #2
Describe what work your team members did and what other people did for your project.
Please see the Medals requirements page for more details.
What should this page contain?
- Clearly state what the team accomplished
- General Support
- Project support and advice
- Fundraising help and advice
- Lab support
- Difficult technique support
- Project advisor support
- Wiki support
- Presentation coaching
- Human Practices support
- Thanks and acknowledgements for all other people involved in helping make a successful iGEM team
Tell us if your institution teaches an iGEM or synthetic biology class and when you started your project:
- Does your institution teach an iGEM or synthetic biology course?
- When did you start this course?
- Are the syllabus and course materials freely available online?
- When did you start your brainstorming?
- When did you start in the lab?
- When did you start working on your project?
Inspiration
Take a look at what other teams have done:
- 2011 Imperial College London (scroll to the bottom)
- 2014 Exeter
- 2014 Melbourne
- 2014 Valencia Biocampus
Why is this page needed?
The Attribution requirement helps the judges know what you did yourselves and what you had help with. You can get help with difficult or complex techniques, but you must report what work your team did and what work was done by others.
For example, you might choose to work with an animal model during your project. Working with animals requires getting a license and applying far in advance to conduct certain experiments in many countries. This is difficult to achieve during the course of a summer, but much easier if you can work with a postdoc or PI who has the right licenses.
Can we base our project on a previous one?
Yes! You can have a project based on a previous team, or based on someone else's idea, as long as you state this fact very clearly and give credit for the original project.