Difference between revisions of "Team:CCU Taiwan/Results"

m
m
Line 202: Line 202:
 
             <section id="con">
 
             <section id="con">
 
                 <h2>Conjugations of primary amines to the glass fiber membranes</h2>
 
                 <h2>Conjugations of primary amines to the glass fiber membranes</h2>
                 <p>We expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mock E protein to show that that after modification, the glass fiber membrane can bind to the primary amines (side-chain amines) from a peptide or protein. We appreciate Mingdao iGEM 2020, who generously provided us with a plasmid containing the green fluorescent protein gene (GFPmut1, BBa_K1159311). The modified glass fiber membranes were immersed in GFP supernatant from the culture medium for 30 mins to form amide bonds. To verify that the experiments work, we measured the intensity of the fluorescence from GFP using a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (also provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). The intensity of membrane reaction with 0.5x and 1x GFP supernatant are shown in Figure 1.a and 1.b, respectively. We carefully washed the membranes with double-distilled water after the reaction. The intensity was about twice as strong in the 1x supernatant as the 0.5x one, suggesting the conjugation experiments were successful. We also performed the same experiment with non-modified glass fiber membranes as a control, and the intensity of fluorescence is within the range of measurement error (Figure 1.c).</p>
+
                 <p>We expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mock E protein to show that that after modification, the glass fiber membrane can bind to the primary amines (side-chain amines) from a peptide or protein. We appreciate Mingdao iGEM 2020, who generously provided us with a plasmid containing the green fluorescent protein gene (GFPmut1, BBa_K1159311). The modified glass fiber membranes were immersed in GFP supernatant from the culture medium for 30 mins to form amide bonds. To verify that the experiments work, we measured the intensity of the fluorescence from GFP using a Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (also provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). The intensity of membrane reaction with 0.5x and 1x GFP supernatant are shown in Figure 15.(a) and 15.(b), respectively. We carefully washed the membranes with double-distilled water after the reaction. The intensity was about twice as strong in the 1x supernatant as the 0.5x one, suggesting the conjugation experiments were successful. We also performed the same experiment with non-modified glass fiber membranes as a control, and the intensity of fluorescence is within the range of measurement error (Figure 15.(c)).</p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c6/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl1.png">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/c/c6/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl1.png">
                     <p>Figure 1. Fluorescence from (a) modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 1x GFP stock,  (b) modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 0.5x GFP stock, and (c) non-modified glass fiber membranes.</p>
+
                     <p>Figure 15. Fluorescence from (a) modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 1x GFP stock,  (b) modified glass fiber membranes reacting with 0.5x GFP stock, and (c) non-modified glass fiber membranes.</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
                 <p>We also confirmed the reactivity of glass fiber membranes to amines using DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) by measuring the fluorescence spectra with a plate reader (provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). We used the same coupling conditions for GFP. Figure 2. shows that with the modification, the emission has a 0.5-fold enhancement in DNA conjugation.</p>
+
                 <p>We also confirmed the reactivity of glass fiber membranes to amines using DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) by measuring the fluorescence spectra with a plate reader (provided by Mingdao iGEM 2020). We used the same coupling conditions for GFP. Figure 16. shows that with the modification, the emission has a 0.5-fold enhancement in DNA conjugation.</p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/3/38/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl2.png">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/3/38/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl2.png">
                     <p>Figure 2. The fluorescence spectra of DNA conjugated glass fiber membrane (blue), the control experiment (red), in which DNAs react with non-modified membranes, and the empty well (gray). The spectra were obtained at an excitation of 320 nm.</p>
+
                     <p>Figure 16. The fluorescence spectra of DNA conjugated glass fiber membrane (blue), the control experiment (red), in which DNAs react with non-modified membranes, and the empty well (gray). The spectra were obtained at an excitation of 320 nm.</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
Line 222: Line 222:
 
                 <p>To conjugate the peptides to the AuNPs, pre-treatment of the AuNPs is necessary. However, during this process, aggregation of AuNPs could happen, which would result in failure of the experiment.</p>
 
                 <p>To conjugate the peptides to the AuNPs, pre-treatment of the AuNPs is necessary. However, during this process, aggregation of AuNPs could happen, which would result in failure of the experiment.</p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
                 <p>First, we used MUA/MCH to modify 13-nm AuNPs by adding carboxylic groups to the surface. However, the AuNPs aggregated to a size of about 1,800 nm (Figure 3.a) after we applied the EDC/NHS treatment. We found that if we replaced EDC with DCC, the size of AuNPs aggregation was reduced to about 350 nm (Figure 3.b). But 350 nm is not small enough, so we further tried replacing MUA/MCH with MHA /SB thiol, which was then treated with EDC/NHS. We obtained a significantly smaller size of 90 nm (Figure 3.c). We used these particles for the following experiments.</p>
+
                 <p>First, we used MUA/MCH to modify 13-nm AuNPs by adding carboxylic groups to the surface. However, the AuNPs aggregated to a size of about 1,800 nm (Figure 17.(a)) after we applied the EDC/NHS treatment. We found that if we replaced EDC with DCC, the size of AuNPs aggregation was reduced to about 350 nm (Figure 17.(b)). But 350 nm is not small enough, so we further tried replacing MUA/MCH with MHA /SB thiol, which was then treated with EDC/NHS. We obtained a significantly smaller size of 90 nm (Figure 17.(c)). We used these particles for the following experiments.</p>
 
             </section>
 
             </section>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
Line 229: Line 229:
 
                 <p>As a proof of concept that we are able to form the covalent bonds between the primary amines (from the PTRS) and AuNPs, we tried to conjugate the DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) with the modified AuNPs.</p>
 
                 <p>As a proof of concept that we are able to form the covalent bonds between the primary amines (from the PTRS) and AuNPs, we tried to conjugate the DNA primers (TRS-110R*7, BBa_K3648007) with the modified AuNPs.</p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
                 <p>We used Raman spectrometer verify if the experiments worked. We found that with the DNA conjugation, the Raman signals have a significant decrease (Figure 4.). Although we have no model to explain this effect, we believe it resulted from interactions with the DNA, suggesting DNA can bind to AuNPs.</p>
+
                 <p>We used Raman spectrometer verify if the experiments worked. We found that with the DNA conjugation, the Raman signals have a significant decrease (Figure 18.). Although we have no model to explain this effect, we believe it resulted from interactions with the DNA, suggesting DNA can bind to AuNPs.</p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                 <div id="imginfo">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/a/aa/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl4.png">
 
                     <img width="70%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/a/aa/T--CCU_Taiwan--Results_dl4.png">
                     <p>Figure 4. The Raman spectra of DCC/NHS modified AuNPs (yellow), and DCC/NHS modified AuNPs conjugated with 0.1 μM (blue) and 1 μM (red) DNA primers.</p>
+
                     <p>Figure 18. The Raman spectra of DCC/NHS modified AuNPs (yellow), and DCC/NHS modified AuNPs conjugated with 0.1 μM (blue) and 1 μM (red) DNA primers.</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </section>
 
             </section>

Revision as of 10:47, 27 October 2020

Results