Difference between revisions of "Team:CCU Taiwan/Education"

m
m
Line 54: Line 54:
 
             <p>We were fully aware that it’s impossible to grasp lots of scientific knowledge in one class, especially in a situation where they have little contact with science. Thus, we designed the lessons with hand-on activities, trying to <b>spark children’s interest</b> about science in a fun and interactive way.</p>
 
             <p>We were fully aware that it’s impossible to grasp lots of scientific knowledge in one class, especially in a situation where they have little contact with science. Thus, we designed the lessons with hand-on activities, trying to <b>spark children’s interest</b> about science in a fun and interactive way.</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
             <p>Spatially, we decided to let the children sit around us instead of sitting on chairs as we wanted them to feel relaxed and free. In our lesson plan, as the children we taught were from 4 years old to 14 years old, we decided to carry out the lesson in a <b>story-telling way</b> with small games and also <b>hands-on activities.</b></p>
+
             <p>Spatially, we decided to let the children sit around us instead of sitting on chairs as we wanted them to feel relaxed and free. In our lesson plan, as the children we taught were from 6 years old to 12 years old, we decided to carry out the lesson in a <b>story-telling way</b> with small games and also <b>hands-on activities.</b></p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">

Revision as of 09:45, 19 October 2020

Science Communication

Overview

Science is not only working in a lab. It should step out of the laboratory and connect with society. However, we recognize that there is still a huge gap between science and society. We aimed to break this gap and bring science closer to society in order to achieve two-way communication. We started by improving society’s understanding of science and synthetic biology, since we know that a premise of effective communication is adequate understanding.


Another focus of our science communication was to provide knowledge about dengue, as we considered it important to inform the public about the severity of dengue and raise their awareness about this disease so that they could take action.


A successful project comes from engaging with communities of different ages, cultures and professional backgrounds. Taking all of this into consideration, we tried to reach out to as broad an audience as we could. We did this by breaking the accessibility barriers by diversifying our ways of engagement and using various unconventional networks. We particularly engaged with some groups that are underrepresented in science, hoping to amplify their voices.


We hope that our actions are not just a one-time thing, but could have a sustainable and continuous impact on the public. We tried to maximize our impact by inviting the community to participate and contribute to communication of science.