Difference between revisions of "Team:CCU Taiwan/Education"

m
m
Line 65: Line 65:
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <p>We also introduced the concept of <b>genotype and phenotype</b> and <b>how dominant and recessive genes influenced human phenotypes</b>. We tried to explain to them in a more interactive way using the analogy of the dominant gene as an elder brother with the recessive gene as a younger brother. The elder brother who is more aggressive always bullies the younger brother, which results in expression of only the dominant gene most of the time. As most of them had siblings, they could easily understand and remember this concept.</p>
 
             <p>We also introduced the concept of <b>genotype and phenotype</b> and <b>how dominant and recessive genes influenced human phenotypes</b>. We tried to explain to them in a more interactive way using the analogy of the dominant gene as an elder brother with the recessive gene as a younger brother. The elder brother who is more aggressive always bullies the younger brother, which results in expression of only the dominant gene most of the time. As most of them had siblings, they could easily understand and remember this concept.</p>
 +
            <br>
 +
            <p>We also introduced <b>gel electrophoresis</b> by describing it as a <b>camera for genes</b> that can show the differences between genes. When teaching them how DNA migrates towards the positive electrode, we used an analogy that larger strands DNA were bulky so they run slower while smaller strands could run faster. Lastly, we explained the <b>concept of BioBricks</b> in a simple manner by asking them to draw a dinosaur based on the features we provided. They chose their favorite features, and arranged them in the ‘plasmid’ we had prepared, so that the ‘plasmid’ would ‘express’ the features of the dinosaur they wanted!</p>
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <div id="imginfo">
 
             <div id="imginfo">
Line 70: Line 72:
 
                 <img id="imginfo1" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/6/6e/T--CCU_Taiwan--Education_1_5.jpeg">
 
                 <img id="imginfo1" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2020/6/6e/T--CCU_Taiwan--Education_1_5.jpeg">
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
            <br>
 
            <p>We also introduced <b>gel electrophoresis</b> by describing it as a <b>camera for genes</b> that can show the differences between genes. When teaching them how DNA migrates towards the positive electrode, we used an analogy that larger strands DNA were bulky so they run slower while smaller strands could run faster. Lastly, we explained the <b>concept of BioBricks</b> in a simple manner by asking them to draw a dinosaur based on the features we provided. They chose their favorite features, and arranged them in the ‘plasmid’ we had prepared, so that the ‘plasmid’ would ‘express’ the features of the dinosaur they wanted!</p>
 
 
             <br>
 
             <br>
 
             <p>We found the lecture <b>a huge success</b> as they <b>showed great interest in science</b>, kept asking questions during the lesson, and could clearly remember the contents we taught when we asked questions at the end. We were impressed by their enthusiasm as it demonstrated that <b>our attempt was right and effective.</b></p>
 
             <p>We found the lecture <b>a huge success</b> as they <b>showed great interest in science</b>, kept asking questions during the lesson, and could clearly remember the contents we taught when we asked questions at the end. We were impressed by their enthusiasm as it demonstrated that <b>our attempt was right and effective.</b></p>

Revision as of 13:23, 20 October 2020

Science Communication

Overview

Science is not only working in a lab. It should step out of the laboratory and connect with society. However, we recognize that there is still a huge gap between science and society. We aimed to break this gap and bring science closer to society in order to achieve two-way communication. We started by improving society’s understanding of science and synthetic biology, since we know that a premise of effective communication is adequate understanding.


Another focus of our science communication was to provide knowledge about dengue, as we considered it important to inform the public about the severity of dengue and raise their awareness about this disease so that they could take action.


A successful project comes from engaging with communities of different ages, cultures and professional backgrounds. Taking all of this into consideration, we tried to reach out to as broad an audience as we could. We did this by breaking the accessibility barriers by diversifying our ways of engagement and using various unconventional networks. We particularly engaged with some groups that are underrepresented in science, hoping to amplify their voices.


We hope that our actions are not just a one-time thing, but could have a sustainable and continuous impact on the public. We tried to maximize our impact by inviting the community to participate and contribute to communication of science.