Difference between revisions of "Team:Calgary/Software"

Line 213: Line 213:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
<p>
 
<p>
With the subprojects' effort above, we were able to witness and tune Oviita without the lab.  From the protein engineering models, we built confidence in our system's field efficacy with our proteins. These models were then able to influence the design and sequence of our parts directly. Then came issues around our organism's cultivation, and if it could handle the pummeling we were putting it through. This was addressed and answered via the metabolic flux models. These also greatly influenced the design and deployment strategy of our bioreactor.
+
The fingerprints of our software can be traced throughout our entire project. This has benefited not only the project but also the software as well. Our team is extremely interdisciplinary, and through more and more members of the team using the software, we have been able to gain user input from individuals that we would not normally consider in our development strategy. The result is software that considers the biologist, engineer, and our dashingly handsome statistician. We hope that this will increase its usefulness to other teams allowing it to become a part of many different projects in both the dry and wetlab.
<br><br>
+
 
Finally came something unexpected. We were given a subproject through HP, the detection of vitamin A levels in the blood. For this, we had to undergo a project level of modelling so that we could ensure our HP contacts of its viability.  
+
<br><br>
+
Modelling was the gateway inwhich we built Oviita to be physically sustainable. With HP and the preliminary findings in the lab, Oviita can grow from the models to be sustainable for the communities it seeks to help.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Revision as of 15:48, 27 October 2020



SOFTWARE


Software for this year was completed in hope to provide tools and building blocks for future teams while enabling other aspects of our own project. The following softwares were the fruits of our labour over the summer.



The fingerprints of our software can be traced throughout our entire project. This has benefited not only the project but also the software as well. Our team is extremely interdisciplinary, and through more and more members of the team using the software, we have been able to gain user input from individuals that we would not normally consider in our development strategy. The result is software that considers the biologist, engineer, and our dashingly handsome statistician. We hope that this will increase its usefulness to other teams allowing it to become a part of many different projects in both the dry and wetlab.